As President Trump prepares to take office, one of the main focuses of his incoming administration is to broker a resolution to the ongoing war between Ukraine and Russia. Recent media coverage has highlighted the positive rapport between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, echoing their interactions during Trump’s previous term. This revived camaraderie sets a favorable stage for potential negotiations. However, Ukraine stands at a critical juncture as it faces the most severe consequences, no matter which way the pendulum swings.

If Trump decides to cut off the substantial U.S. financial aid that has been sustaining Ukraine’s war efforts, Ukraine could face significant challenges on the battlefield. This raises a vital question: in the absence of support, how far will Ukraine go to safeguard its sovereignty and defend itself against Russian aggression?

Reports have emerged suggesting that Kyiv may be considering an escalation to a new level of warfare. There is speculation about a plan to develop a small nuclear bomb, though Ukrainian officials have been quick to dismiss these rumors. However, if Russia finds credible evidence of such plans, Ukraine risks a swift and possibly devastating nuclear response from Russia before it could even complete development.

Why the Escalation?
Understanding this potential escalation requires a closer look at the current state of the conflict. Just yesterday, Kyiv experienced a barrage of drones and missile strikes, marking the first major aerial assault since last August. While Ukraine made territorial gains over the summer, its frontlines are now weakening. This shift is further compounded by the bolstered alliance between Russia and North Korea, with ground troops from both nations actively involved in frontline assaults.

On the political front, the Republican party’s recent success in consolidating power could give Trump the leverage needed to advance his policy agenda with little opposition. This could include scaling back aid to Ukraine if it resists a peace proposal that would likely require territorial concessions and a formal pledge to abandon its NATO aspirations. Without U.S. support, Ukraine would face significant military disadvantages. Even if Ukraine were able to secure alternative resources, the question remains whether it could prevail in such an imbalanced conflict.

Given these circumstances, the nuclear option—while extreme—may represent Ukraine’s only means of achieving a strategic edge. Reports speculate that a potential Ukrainian bomb would be relatively small, similar to the atomic bomb deployed in Nagasaki in 1945. However, Ukraine has officially denied any plans to acquire, develop, or possess nuclear weapons. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy himself has acknowledged that Ukraine has the technical capability to produce such a weapon but has dismissed this as a last resort.

Alternative Paths: NATO and Desperation
Another potential fallback for Ukraine is joining NATO, which would grant it collective defense assurances. However, given the geopolitical complexities, this pathway remains uncertain. Ukraine appears to be in a race to fortify its defenses in anticipation of potentially losing U.S. support. President Biden, under pressure to extend aid during his remaining time in office, could offer Ukraine a temporary buffer. However, Biden has yet to announce any definitive plans for a substantial final aid package.

The concern persists that, if diplomatic efforts fail, Ukraine could be forced to make a drastic choice. Should Ukraine opt to pursue nuclear weapons, it would introduce a new era of global insecurity, likely triggering an arms race with long-term repercussions for global stability, economy, and peace. This decision would place immense pressure on the international community, which would then face a delicate and potentially volatile new chapter in arms control.

Ultimately, the pivotal question is: “How determined is Ukraine to continue this war in defense of its national sovereignty?” Perhaps more importantly, it is also a question of whether Ukraine is willing to sacrifice the principles it has fought for since the war began. The choices made in the coming months will shape not only Ukraine’s future but the global order for generations to come.