President-elect Donald Trump’s Cabinet nominations have drawn sharp scrutiny due to their unconventional nature, sparking debate over their implications for governance and economic stability. Some question their ability and qualifications, while some of Trump’s enemies use this as an opportunity to argue that he is selecting Cabinet members based on their loyalty to him—turning his Cabinet into what they claim is a gathering of his friends.

Controversial Cabinet Selections

 Lynda McMahon (Secretary of Education):
Tasked with dismantling the U.S. Department of Education, McMahon’s background in entertainment rather than education has raised questions about her ability to handle this critical role.

 Matt Gaetz (Attorney General):
Gaetz’s nomination has provoked outrage due to allegations of sexual misconduct, which remain under investigation by the House Ethics Committee. His resignation from Congress shortly after the nomination has intensified skepticism about his ability to serve as the nation’s top law enforcement officer.

 Pete Hegseth (Defense Secretary):
Hegseth faces criticism for allegations of sexual assault dating back to 2017, which he denies. His controversial views on military reform and diversity policies, combined with questions about his leadership, have amplified concerns over his nomination.

 Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (Secretary of Health and Human Services):
A vocal vaccine skeptic, Kennedy’s nomination has alarmed public health experts, who worry that his stance could undermine decades of progress in healthcare. His controversial statements about vaccines have already impacted related industries, raising further concerns.

 Tulsi Gabbard (Director of National Intelligence):
Gabbard’s limited experience in intelligence matters and past comments perceived as sympathetic to Russian interests have drawn criticism. Experts question her ability to oversee U.S. national security effectively.

These picks reflect Trump’s intent to challenge established norms. While supporters praise these nominees as reformers, opponents argue that their questionable qualifications undermine governance.

Public Reaction and Political Implications

Public opinion remains sharply divided. Supporters view the nominees as disruptors poised to deliver significant change, while detractors emphasize their controversies, lack of expertise, and potential conflicts of interest.

The Senate confirmation process is expected to be contentious as Republican lawmakers balance advancing Trump’s agenda with addressing public and media concerns. Despite the controversies, historical precedent indicates that incoming presidents often receive considerable deference in their Cabinet appointments. With Republicans holding a Senate majority, Trump’s nominees are likely to be confirmed. However, these appointments underscore broader systemic issues, such as the prioritization of loyalty over qualifications in government roles.

As Trump’s administration takes shape, these nominations set a precedent for governance and accountability, offering insights into the challenges of reshaping U.S. politics.

What Can It Do for Trump?

If Trump’s appointees fail to meet public expectations, it could have serious repercussions. Public sentiment may shift drastically against him, particularly if the nominees cause more harm than good to their departments and the people they serve.

While Trump aims to dismantle some departments, like Education, others require competent leadership to stabilize the economy, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Trump’s promise to revamp the SEC to support the crypto industry initially sounded promising, but unqualified leadership could lead to scams, financial chaos, and reduced trust in the agency.

Trump’s selection process appears to prioritize loyalty over qualifications. This strategy could ensure alignment with his policies but may also prove detrimental if his nominees are unable to navigate challenges effectively.

What of the Dollar?

The dollar continues to rise as Trump consolidates control over his administration. His policies and appointments suggest a smoother path for his agenda. However, the risk of over-inflation looms large.

While moderate inflation strengthens the dollar, excessive inflation could drive up prices for goods and services, negating the benefits of increased monetary value. Trump’s success in controlling energy prices and boosting domestic productivity—evident in his tariff policies—could help mitigate these risks. However, failure to manage these critical factors could lead to economic instability, ultimately undermining the dollar’s strength.

What’s more, if his Cabinet selections fail, it could erode public trust in the government and its ability to govern effectively. While the failure of an individual department may not immediately dominate headlines, a large-scale failure that significantly impacts the economy could trigger a disastrous spiral affecting global stability.

How can we know how this will turn out?
Only time will tell. The coming months will reveal the true impact of Trump’s decisions and their implications for the dollar and the broader economy.